I bet you can search the nanog list archive and find this very discussion topic surface about ever 8-12 months... folk always fall in this trap (or a form of it): "Welp, we've had 1 too many people in $CORP get infected via email, spam filter all the things!!!" ... wait... "Oh, yea duh.. our spam/abuse alias can't block spam.. because people will send us email they get that has spam/viruses/etc in it..whoops!!" this 'always' happens, and we discuss it every 8-12 months. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:18 PM Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:
Seemed pretty clear to me. He sent an abuse report to abuse@psychz.net and it was rejected as spam.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:11 PM Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org> wrote:
Dan,
Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint is.
-mel via cell
On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian@ampr.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: can we please just stop this nonsense?
ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports as-is.
requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to report it to you is not acceptable.
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abuse@psychz.net> (reason: 550 "The mail server detected your message as spam and has prevented delivery.")
abuse@fsec.or.kr and cert@fsec.or.kr do the same thing. - Brian