On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:03:39AM -0700, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
Interesting comment Paul. However, 16e and evdo are a "bit" heavy with infrastructure to support mobility. Before giving that answer, you may want to ask Deepak if he NEEDS mobility....
He needs mobility. If he doesn't know that, it means he hasn't done his due diligence properly. Cheers, -- jra
On 16 May 2008, at 10.23, Paul Wall wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net> wrote:
Are there any good (published) BCPs for building out Municipal WiFi networks? Particularly in the security/authentication/scaling areas?
BCP #58,271,432--which basically states "Don't," comes highly recommended.
Instead, investigate your nearest .16e or evdo rev. A reseller. In the case of .16e, most available APN's are built around user and transport/transit abstractions, assuming shared-facilities, virtual providers, etc. The equipment used in both is a far cry from anything 802.11. -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin)