On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
The second option.
Well, there is the first under process too, but the second is the priority at the moment.
it's a little mystifying that they can't arrange a 'hot cut' of the link then between the 2 locations. They were able to do this for an org I don't work for but help out... for 2 links in a cage->cage move event just a little less than a year ago actually.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog@ics-il.net > wrote:
Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc.
Can anyone lend any input either way on that?
there are 2 meanings (at least) to 'move', did you mean: 1) move port from 1G to 10G (or 'change speed') 2) move port from cage/rack1 to cage/rack2 (endpoint move in your space(s) )
<blockquote>
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
</blockquote>