4 Dec
2013
4 Dec
'13
3:33 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
IF deployed by operators correctly, the global routing table should be 1 IPv6 route per ASN. However, that is only feasible if each ASN can efficiently aggregate forever (or 50 years at least).
and if your capacity between 2 asn endpoints is always able to handle the traffic load offered, right? else you start having to traffic-engineer... which today means deaggregate (or announce some more specifics along with the aggregate). I'm not sure I'd make a bet that I can always have enough capacity between any two asn endpoints that I wouldn't need to TE.