On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Matt Peterson <matt@peterson.org> wrote:
This week at NANOG67, a presentation was given early on that did not reflect well for our community at large.
I think that the data presented was interesting but the style of the presenter and tone could have been different. It seemed to be a variant of “The Rent is Too Damn High”[1] while it can be interesting, there wasn’t a complete talk there IMHO. The feedback mechanism for this is honestly the survey[2]. I’m confident that the PC will take this input seriously and work with presenters in this regard. The IXP cost sheet[3] that is being maintained by Job I think gives an idea of the peering vs transit costs assuming various bitrates and list prices. The fates of IXPs and their roles will naturally resolve itself through market economics I suspect. - Jared - snip - links - snip - 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_Is_Too_Damn_High_Party 2 - https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog67/survey 3 - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ztPX_ysWYqEhJlf2SKQQsTNRbkwoxPSfaC6...