----- Original Message -----
From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Over the last decade, 19 states have made it illegal for municipalities to own fiber networks
Hi Jay,
Everything government does, it does badly. Without exception. There are many things government does better than any private organization is likely to sustain, but even those things it does slowly and at an exorbitant price.
Sure it does, Bill. Retake civics, will you? Read about The Public Good, and tell me how profit-driven corporations -- especially public ones -- are the orgs best suited to protect and support it.
Muni fiber is a competition killer. You can't beat city hall; once built it's not practical to compete, even with better service, so residents are stuck with only the overpriced (either directly or via taxes), usually underpowered and always one-size-fits-all network access which results. As an ISP I watched something similar happen in Altoona PA a decade and a half ago. It was a travesty.
Did you miss, perhaps, the 2 month long thread I started end of 2012, concerning building out a L1/L2 fiber muni?
The only exception I see to this would be if localities were constrained to providing point to point and point to multipoint communications infrastructure within the locality on a reasonable and non-discriminatory basis. The competition that would foster on the services side might outweigh the damage on the infrastructure side. Like public roads facilitate efficient transportation and freight despite the cost and potholes, though that's an imperfect simile.
I guess you didn't. May 6 fiber installers dig up the street in front of your house over the next 2 years.
Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
Possibly not. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274