29 Nov
2010
29 Nov
'10
10:22 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
No one will ever be in ratio compliance with an eyeball dominant network. Ever. Period. It's not possible via technology and TOS. Enforcing it as an eyeball network just forces content providers to aquire eyeballs, e.g. compete with you. That's bad business.
see craig's report from nanog47: <http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Monday/Labovitz_ObserveReport_N47_Mon.pdf> not for a time has Comcast been solely an 'eye-ball' network... or so they think. -chris (I don't disagree with leo's stance, though I'm not a peering person so I really try never to know how all of that magic works)