I would say that under normal circumstances, 45 days might work (Personally, I would prefer 90 days). However, I suggest we are not dealing with a normal circumstance because of the fall out from the winter incident. On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:35 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
On 4/14/21 18:03, Stan Barber wrote:
I would suggest that the regulation paradigm in Texas does not allow coordinated maintenance scheduling to adapt to supply and load issues (especially in the face of a disaster like the Winter event earlier this year). That would mean a stronger regulatory framework and that smacks of government interference in the eyes of some.
45 days of planned notice, is what I read. And can be rejected if that notification window is shorter than that.
Is that sufficient?
Mark.