I would say that under normal circumstances, 45 days might work (Personally, I would prefer 90 days).

However, I suggest we are not dealing with a normal circumstance because of the fall out from the winter incident.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:35 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:

On 4/14/21 18:03, Stan Barber wrote:

> I would suggest that the regulation paradigm in Texas does not allow
> coordinated maintenance scheduling to adapt to supply and load issues
> (especially in the face of a disaster like the Winter event earlier
> this year). That would mean a stronger regulatory framework and that
> smacks of government interference in the eyes of some.

45 days of planned notice, is what I read. And can be rejected if that
notification window is shorter than that.

Is that sufficient?

Mark.