CAF nor RDOF required IPv6. BEAD doesn't say anything about IPv6. I seriously doubt v6 gets included into the conversation because even NANOG can't agree it is needed. The bigger concern are the people that have no connectivity at all (no 1 mbps, no 25/3, no 100/20, no gigabit, etc). On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:41 AM j k <jsklein@gmail.com> wrote:
With this funding, does the FCC require IPv6 and/or dual stack? If not, it could cause a new IPv6 digital divide.
Joe Klein
On Tue, May 24, 2022, 9:21 AM Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua> wrote:
Do they help with a local government ("we do not need your cables, go avway")?
23.05.22 21:56, Sean Donelan пише:
Money, money, money.
On Mon, 23 May 2022, Aaron Wendel wrote:
The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US household will need more than a gig within 5 years. Why not just jump it to a gig or more?
On 5/23/2022 1:40 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-bro...
The Federal Communications Commission voted [May 19, 2022] to seek comment on a proposal to provide additional universal service support to certain rural carriers in exchange for increasing deployment to more locations at higher speeds. The proposal would make changes to the Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program, with the goal of achieving widespread deployment of faster 100/20 Mbps broadband service throughout the rural areas served by rural carriers currently receiving A-CAM support.