CAF nor RDOF required IPv6.  BEAD doesn't say anything about IPv6.  I seriously doubt v6 gets included into the conversation because even NANOG can't agree it is needed.  The bigger concern are the people that have no connectivity at all (no 1 mbps, no 25/3, no 100/20, no gigabit, etc).

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:41 AM j k <jsklein@gmail.com> wrote:
With this funding, does the FCC require IPv6 and/or dual stack?  If not, it could cause a new IPv6 digital divide.

Joe Klein

On Tue, May 24, 2022, 9:21 AM Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua> wrote:
Do they help with a local government ("we do not need your cables, go
avway")?

23.05.22 21:56, Sean Donelan пише:
>
> Money, money, money.
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2022, Aaron Wendel wrote:
>
>> The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US
>> household will need more than a gig within 5 years.  Why not just jump
>> it to a gig or more?
>>
>>
>> On 5/23/2022 1:40 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0
>>>
>>> The Federal Communications Commission voted [May 19, 2022] to seek
>>> comment on a proposal to provide additional universal service support
>>> to certain rural carriers in exchange for increasing deployment to
>>> more locations at higher speeds. The proposal would make changes to
>>> the Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program, with the
>>> goal of achieving widespread deployment of faster 100/20 Mbps
>>> broadband service throughout the rural areas served by rural carriers
>>> currently receiving A-CAM support.
>>>
>>
>>
>