[ Oops. Disregard. Damn, but I wish Zimbra understood List-Reply. I only hung the bug ticket 4 years (and two major releases) ago... --j ] ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com> To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:41:05 PM Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket Image attach corruption ----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Lansford" <Joshua.Lansford@laserlinc.com>
On 02/07/2013 02:43 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Question: do you guys make a point, at all, of evangelizing to distro maintainers and packagers that they package 4.x, or, more to the point pull 3.x*out* of repos?
I checked and there are separate packages for rt4. I understand leaving the 3.8 around as not to surprise folks when they do a system upgrade.
Yeah.
It would have been nice if they had updated their wiki though. Quite a bummer as I just went live. I am going to try and set up a duplicate system on a virtual machine to test upgrade to 4.0. Thanks for pointing this out. I will be following this guide: http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/07/upgrading-to-rt-4.html
About the wiki, it's largely me you're complaining about, so you got the right guy: I did a large bolus of rework on it around 3.8 release time, and have not been using rt-due to job changes-since, so I haven't gotten around to reworking it again for 4.x.
If I get a full-time $DAYJOB I'm in the running for right now, that will likely change, as I'll be rolling out 4.0 for there, and updating/merging the current doco to the wiki.
Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
-- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274