1 Jan
2013
1 Jan
'13
10:46 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf@dessus.com> wrote:
Perhaps Googles other "harvesters" and the government agents they sell or give user credentials to, don't work against privately (not under the goverment thumb) encryption keys without the surveillance state expending significantly more resources.
Perhaps the cheapest way to solve this is to apply thumbscrews and have google require the use of co-option freindly keying material by their victims errr customers errr users.
you lost me in conspiracy theories, can you rephrase?