Those are exchange point networks. I'd expect to see those as inconsistent. On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:28:31PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Hello All;
We had a problem with a domain with two different AS paths in the BGP table, so I wrote a script to look for such problems.
There are two prefixes in the current MBGP tables here with such problems :
Date of BGP Dump Mon Jun 18 15:39:46 EDT 2001
ROUTING INCONSISTENCY Detected for Prefix = 198.9.201.0 :
*> 198.9.201.0 160.81.38.225 75 0 1239 10888 i * 204.147.129.89 0 145 24 i
ROUTING INCONSISTENCY Detected for Prefix = 198.9.202.0 :
* 198.9.202.0 204.147.129.89 0 145 24 i *> 160.81.38.225 75 0 1239 10888 i
And a total of 488 prefixes in the BGP tables with such problems !!!!!
The complete lists are contained in
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/mbgp.inconsistency and http://www.multicasttech.com/status/bgp.inconsistency
I could update these regularly if there was any demand.
I may be obtuse, but I cannot see how this could be a good thing.
Regards Marshall Eubanks
T.M. Eubanks Multicast Technologies, Inc 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609 e-mail : tme@multicasttech.com http://www.on-the-i.com
Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/ Check the status of multicast in real time : http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.