2 Feb
2008
2 Feb
'08
3:58 p.m.
On Feb 2, 2008 3:39 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb@byrneit.net> wrote:
The bigger issue with all these approaches is that they run afoul of a patent applied for by AT&T:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u =%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=200 60031575&OS=20060031575&RS=20060031575
USPTO App Number 20060031575
Somene from ATT may want to consider pulling this patent application since it seems to fail on prior art... http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0410/soricelli.html presented by a juniper employee (Joe Soricelli ) and Wayne Gustavus from Verizon. IANAL though...