7 Dec
2013
7 Dec
'13
12:35 p.m.
Jamie, methinks you are confusing 2002 with 2001.... Jared Mauch > On Dec 7, 2013, at 11:26 AM, jamie rishaw <j@arpa.com> wrote: > > (A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at > cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-) > > jamie > > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Geraint Jones <geraint@koding.com> wrote: >> >> Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :) >> -- >> Geraint Jones >> >> >> >> >>> On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "Richard Porter" <richard@pedantictheory.com> wrote: >>> >>> *Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that >>> load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much >>> extra storage those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years? >>> >>> ~Richard >>> >>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa <roganschlassa@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically >>>> SPAM >>>> and of course nonsense. >>>> >>>> The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on >>>> us >>>> is rediculous. >>>> >>>> If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and >>>> two >>>> use a different email. >>>> On Dec 5, 2013 3:56 PM, "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstuppi@cisco.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks folks. Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and >>>>> v6. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> "We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> John Stuppi, CISSP >>>>> Technical Leader >>>>> Strategic Security Research >>>>> jstuppi@cisco.com >>>>> Phone: +1 732 516 5994 >>>>> Mobile: 732 319 3886 >>>>> >>>>> CCIE, Security - 11154 >>>>> Cisco Systems >>>>> Mail Stop INJ01/2/ >>>>> 111 Wood Avenue South >>>>> Iselin, New Jersey 08830 >>>>> United States >>>>> Cisco.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Think before you print. >>>>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the >>>>> sole >>>>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or >>>>> disclosure >>>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>>>> recipient (or >>>>> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by >>>>> reply email and delete all copies of this message. >>>>> For corporate legal information go to: >>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM >>>>> To: Henri Wahl >>>>> Cc: NANOG list >>>>> Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6 >>>>> >>>>> I'm seeing it down via IPv6: >>>>> >>>>> * Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90... >>>>> * Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0) >>>>>> GET / HTTP/1.1 >>>>>> User-Agent: curl/7.30.0 >>>>>> Host: www.cisco.com >>>>>> Accept: */* >>>>> < HTTP/1.1 200 OK >>>>> * Server Apache is not blacklisted >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * About to connect() to blogs.cisco.com port 80 (#0) >>>>> * Trying 2001:4800:13c1:10::178... >>>>> ^C >>>>> >>>>> - Jared >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Henri Wahl <h.wahl@ifw-dresden.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com >>>>>> (2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6? >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Henri Wahl >>>>>> >>>>>> IT Department >>>>>> Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u. >>>>>> Werkstoffforschung Dresden >>>>>> >>>>>> tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797 >>>>>> email: h.wahl@ifw-dresden.de >>>>>> http://www.ifw-dresden.de >>>>>> >>>>>> Nagios status monitor Nagstamon: >>>>>> http://nagstamon.ifw-dresden.de >>>>>> >>>>>> DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d: >>>>>> http://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de >>>>>> >>>>>> IFW Dresden e.V., Helmholtzstrasse 20, D-01069 Dresden VR Dresden Nr. >>>>>> 1369 >>>>>> Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Juergen Eckert, Dr. h.c. Dipl.-Finw. Rolf Pfrengle >>>>>> <0x1FBA0942.asc> > > > -- > "sharp, dry wit and brash in his dealings with contestants." - Forbes > If voting didn't matter, the GOP wouldn't make it more difficult than > buying a gun. > /* - teh jamie. ; uri -> http://about.me/jgr */