----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Vixie" <vixie@isc.org>
*Now*, you see, we no longer have a canonical Good Engineering Example to which we can point when yelling at people (and software vendors) which *do* permit that, to say "see? You shouldn't be doing that; it's bad."
"The Web Is Not The Internet."
i see what you mean, and i'm sad that this arrow is no longer in your quiver. perhaps you can still refer to nlnetlabs unbound for this purpose.
if i thought there was even one isp anywhere who wanted to use nxdomain remapping but didn't because bind didn't have that feature, i'd be ready to argue the point. but all isc did by not supporting this feature was force some isp's to not use bind, and: isc is not in the "sour grapes" business.
Well, I disagree on that, but I am not widely travelled, and perhaps the obvious argument I see wasn't ever actually used. This is the "do I put cigarette burn preventers on the toilet paper dispensers in my 'no smoking' restroom" problem, pretty much exactly.
meanwhile isc continues to push for ubiquitous dnssec, through to the stub, to take this issue off the table for all people and all time. (that's "the real fix" for nxdomain remapping.)
You really believe that the outcome of that will be "we can't make some extra revenue off NXDOMAIN remapping because of DNSSEC? Well, the hell with DNSSEC, then"? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274