1 Sep
2015
1 Sep
'15
6:38 p.m.
On Sep 1, 2015, at 6:36 PM, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
On 2 Sep 2015, at 3:24, Niels Bakker wrote:
Because variety of flow telemetry delivery options isn't the #1 ranked purchasing decider.
Actually, it is more often than you think. No use routing packets if you can't see what they do.
Otherwise no Cisco would ever have been sold.
Which is utter nonsense, of course, since Cisco a) invented flow telemetry and b) has been the consistent leader in innovating flow telemetry (FNF, IPFIX, anyone?). The EARL6/EARL7 problems are the only stumbles Cisco has made in this regard.
Roland, Please stop digging, Sounds like you haven’t used Cisco recently. I’m happy to elaborate privately. - Jared