On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
I think Randy meant to imply that requiring anyone that wants to actually use the RPKI to make a legal agreement with ARIN might not be
define 'use'... o 'stick their objects into the repo' sure a contract sounds good o 'access the repo to download content' - no, that doesn't sound like it needs a contract is this a messaging problem/issue or did ARIN mean that 'to download content you must sign an agreement/contract with ARIN?' (I hope that the answer is: "of course not! that sounds silly... our messaging could be improved") a closer (by me) reading of: " In order to access the production RPKI TAL, you will first have to agree to ARIN's Relying Party Agreement before the TAL will be emailed to you. To request the TAL after the production release, follow this link: http://www.arin.net/public/rpki/tal/index.xhtml" though kinda leads me into the hole randy/richard fell into... 'to poke the TAL and figure out where things are, you have to sign an agreement'. Isn't the structure of the global system something like: "each asn has a publication point, potentially some share publication-points, everyone has to access everyone else's publication point" and 'TAL' ... seems like odd to me as an RP, don't I want the one TA from IANA (yes, eventually) or at the very least the 1 from each RIR ? (which is a simple single item to download and use in validating the content I get from all the rest of the world?) -chris
the best way to encourage deployment.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Mark Kosters <markk@arin.net> wrote:
On 9/5/12 3:26 AM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
can you find the fatal flaw?
[ hint: how does an isp in phnom penh validate my route? ]
randy
Hi Randy
Your question is a bit cryptic. Could you be more specific about your concern?
Thanks, Mark