On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
On Sep 24, 2016, at 7:47 AM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
Well...by anycast, I meant BGP anycast, spreading the "target" geographically to a dozen or more well connected/peered origins. At that point, your ~600G DDoS might only be around
anycast and tcp? the heck you say! :)
People who've tried it say it works fine.
It’s worked fine for 28 years, for me.
boy, it'd sure be nice if there were some 'science' and 'measurement' behind such statements. Didn't k-root do some anycast studies ~8-10 years back? -chris (note I'm totally a believer in anycast for tcp in the 'right' circumstances, but often it feels like talking to climate-change-deniers when proffering it as a solution)