Respectfully: How can something be deployed if it doesn't even exist? I think we'd all be better off focusing on deploying real things with real implementations--you know, like IPv6... And not debating the merits of a protocol that doesn't exist except in.. Umm.. "theory". And I'll save you some research. I'm not part of some ipv6 spamhaus illuminati group. Kinda wish I was--I've always wanted to be part of an exclusive club. -Neil On May 13, 2020, 17:31, at 17:31, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed. ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com@nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:
https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traf...
Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.
Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?