Respectfully:

How can something be deployed if it doesn't even exist?

I think we'd all be better off focusing on deploying real things with real implementations--you know, like IPv6... And not debating the merits of a protocol that doesn't exist except in.. Umm.. "theory".

And I'll save you some research. I'm not part of some ipv6 spamhaus illuminati group. Kinda wish I was--I've always wanted to be part of an exclusive club.

-Neil
On May 13, 2020, at 17:31, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed.
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
 

I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com@nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

 

Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:

 

 

Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.

 

Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:

 

 

Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?