On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com> wrote:
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com> wrote:
While researching at&t and ipv6 I came across http://www.feise.com/~jfeise/blogs/index.php?blog=8 and also
doesn't that blog basically say: "it's broke Jim..." and that 7018 (really 7132) passes off the anycast into HE.net?
Yes. It does say it's broken. However it's entirely possible that AT&T hands out different routes to their l33t enterprise/govt customers with t1 or better who pay real money, vs end users.
yea... maybe they do, I don't see that from my view of 7018's routing data (limited as it may be)
http://www.corp.att.com/gov/solution/network_services/data_nw/ipv6/
Looks like they have established a tunnel in the United States perhaps?
how did you gather that? Maybe Tom knows more about this and can let us all know?
From:
Remote Access Service to IPv6 Internet
* Support IPv6 for small (or satellite) locations and individual remote users * Reach a dynamically configurable IPv6 Tunnel Gateway through IPv4 ISPs through fractional T1, DSL or dial-up access * The Tunnel Setup Protocol (TSP) will be used to create tunnels to transport IPv6 traffic over an IPv4 network to the gateway
wow, 'tsp'... uhm, what's that I wonder? This: http://www.broker.ipv6.ac.uk/download.html perhaps?? yeek!
Granted that doesn't necessarily mean it's in the United States, but I'm guessing it would be due to being an offering targeted at the United States Government. :)
Sure... I'd love to know though :)
Hence my request for more comments/information.
agreed
Maybe off topic for NANOG but then what does that even mean anymore? :)
I'm fairly sure that operating a network (even a v6 network) is on-topic for nanog.