On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for routing security have been a help in this event? nice to know unsecured IPv6 took some of the load when the unsecured IPv4 path failed.
if all routing goes boom, would secure routing have saved you? no... all routing went boom.
the answer seems to be NO, it would not have helped and would have actually contributed to network instability with large numbers of validation requests sent to the sidr/ca nodes.
I think actually it wouldn't have caused more validation requests, the routers have (in some form of the plan) a cache from their local cache, they use this for origin validation... there's not a requirement to refresh up the entire chain. (I think). -chris
/bill
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:01:04AM -0800, Mike Leber wrote:
We saw an increase in IPv6 traffic which correlated time wise with the onset of this IPv4 incident.
Happy eyeballs in action, automatically shifting what it could.
Mike.
On 11/8/11 2:56 AM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
how would a sidr-enabled routing infrastructure have fared in yesterdays routing circus?
/bill