24 Jul
2010
24 Jul
'10
4:23 p.m.
isn't ipv3.com@gmail.com jim fleming? <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg04279.html> (for reference) pls to not be replying to the list when ipv3.com posts to nanog.. -Chris On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 4:17 PM, William Pitcock <nenolod@systeminplace.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:50 -0400, Steven King wrote:
I am very curious to see how this would play with networks that wouldn't support such a technology. How would you ensure communication between a network that supported 33-Bit addressing and one that doesn't?
33-bit is a fucking retarded choice for any addressing scheme as it's neither byte nor nibble-aligned. Infact, the 33rd bit would ensure that an IPv4 header had to have 5 byte addresses.
William