Todd, thanks for the heads up on this, appreciated. I run bgpmap.net. It's a fairly new domain and I'm pretty sure it got flagged by URIBL as a false positive after being linked so much in the tools thread. Thanks for submitting it for review already, the lookup currently shows it as pending removal, so it should drop off before long. I'm keeping an eye on the listing and will follow up with a delist request myself if it doesn't clear on its own. Thanks again for catching this, Matin On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 10:06 PM nanog--- via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:

Hi all, I recently found 2 recent nanog digest emails in my junk folder due to 2 websites being discussed in this thread about BGP tools: https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/thread/3IBZTYUUG...

The first is bgpmap <dot> net, which is flagged by URIBL ( https://admin.uribl.com/?section=lookup;)

The second is ihr <dot> live, which is flagged by Spamhaus ( https://check.spamhaus.org/)

I've submitted the first for review to URIBL.

For the second one, Spamhaus requests the domain owner submit the request after confirming the domain is abiding by certain criteria. I can email the admin email listed on the contact page for IHR, but if anyone here is affiliated with or knows the owners please take a look or notify the appropriate contact.

Thanks, Todd _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list

https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/MQXYMDLS...

I would suggest that if you don't want your emails to randomly be junked, you don't configure your email system to junk emails based on random criteria. Kevin On 21/09/2026 20:36, nanog--- via NANOG wrote:

Hi all, I recently found 2 recent nanog digest emails in my junk folder due to 2 websites being discussed in this thread about BGP tools: https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/thread/3IBZTYUUG...

The first is bgpmap <dot> net, which is flagged by URIBL (https://admin.uribl.com/?section=lookup;)

The second is ihr <dot> live, which is flagged by Spamhaus (https://check.spamhaus.org/)

I've submitted the first for review to URIBL.

For the second one, Spamhaus requests the domain owner submit the request after confirming the domain is abiding by certain criteria. I can email the admin email listed on the contact page for IHR, but if anyone here is affiliated with or knows the owners please take a look or notify the appropriate contact.

Thanks, Todd _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/MQXYMDLS...

On 9/22/26 9:06 AM, Kevin Tillery via NANOG wrote:

I would suggest that if you don't want your emails to randomly be junked, you don't configure your email system to junk emails based on random criteria.

Kevin

On 21/09/2026 20:36, nanog--- via NANOG wrote:

...

Hi all, I recently found 2 recent nanog digest emails in my junk folder due to 2 websites being discussed in this thread about BGP tools: https:// lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/ thread/3IBZTYUUGCR6CC5OGUDM7YUDVC5ZBGFM/

The first is bgpmap <dot> net, which is flagged by URIBL (https:// admin.uribl.com/?section=lookup;)

The second is ihr <dot> live, which is flagged by Spamhaus (https:// check.spamhaus.org/)

I've submitted the first for review to URIBL.

For the second one, Spamhaus requests the domain owner submit the request after confirming the domain is abiding by certain criteria. I can email the admin email listed on the contact page for IHR, but if anyone here is affiliated with or knows the owners please take a look or notify the appropriate contact.

Thanks, Todd [snip]Agreed with Kevin. Spam filters are the arm of the big email provider cartel trying to enclose the open protocol of SMTP anyway.