20 Jun
2026
20 Jun
'26
7:38 p.m.
Am 20.06.26 um 21:36 schrieb John Levine via NANOG:
It appears that Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> said:
Am 20.06.26 um 08:14 schrieb David Conrad via NANOG:
I have some skepticism that a “turn off IPv4 day” mandate from (some) network operators will change things significantly, but I’m frequently wrong.
It will impact them if large companies like Google or MS decide that IPv6 is mandatory. Such cases pushed SPF/DKIM, TLS, HTTPS etc.
Those all had significant security benefits. IPv6, not so much.
And even that was no reason for SMB to implement them unless "forced" by Google and MS. -- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de