On 4 September 2026 21:46:42 CEST, michael brooks - ESC <michael.brooks@adams12.org> wrote:
[image: image.png]
michael brooks Enterprise Network Architect Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.brooks@adams12.org :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss"
On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 1:36 PM Kevin Tillery via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
I'll be the contrarian here. Surely whether or not this is sane depends on the total price and surrounding circumstances. If a provider charges say $200 for a service, whether they itemize it as $200 connection, free BGP, free IPs; or $180 connection, $20 BGP, free IPs; or $1 connection, $9 BGP, $190 for IPs to run BGP on; is entirely up to them and makes little difference. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@list...
-- This is a staff email account managed by Adams 12 Five Star Schools. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
Is this really an appropriate use of NANOG? Often when I post to NANOG, I am worried that I am being the "reply guy", wasting the time of hundreds of network operators far above my level with some nonsense, and I do not post things that I think will not be at least slightly useful. And I am worried that I am not skilled in professional English writing. But this is far below any standard I apply to myself. This image is now wasting most of a megabyte in how many important people's mailboxes? Kevin