We're doing this pretty widely for internal BGP sessions at $dayjob and it works very well. It also allows us to start pulling away from scatter-shot legacy v4 P2P assignments and replace them with a deployment model that will be cleaner and more scalable in the long run. Thank you jms On Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 13:23 Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
This will only increase as IPv4 becomes more and more stupid.
I would approach any provider that did so asking if we can simply transit our IPv4 routing process over v6 addresses. This is viable on virtually every common routing platform today.
Owen
On Sep 4, 2026, at 09:37, Mike Hammett via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
I'm not going to say no.
----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ From: "Josh Luthman" <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Charging for IPs
Cogent?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 12:30 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
Has anyone else experienced an upstream provider that wants to charge you for the IPs you need to establish BGP sessions?
I understand charging for large blocks, but I literally just got a quote for two /31s. I have an existing contract elsewhere with them, and they gave me 3x /29s gratis (for three different ASNs, sets of BGP sessions, ec.). Now they're charging for each IP.
I thought charging for BGP sessions was ridiculous, but now for individual IPs to use those BGP sessions...
----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/64BRVJOZ...
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/JS2RKN3Q... _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/56HHGPMV...