I’ve said before and i’ll say it again: Friend’s don’t let friends use Cogent -Mike
On Sep 4, 2026, at 09:58, LionLink NOC via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
That’s absurd. IMHO. If NTT is an option, you should talk to someone on their carrier sales team. They’ll build a strategic partnership with you… and last I heard, don’t charge you anything up to a /28.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 12:37 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
I'm not going to say no.
----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ From: "Josh Luthman" <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Charging for IPs
Cogent?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 12:30 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
Has anyone else experienced an upstream provider that wants to charge you for the IPs you need to establish BGP sessions?
I understand charging for large blocks, but I literally just got a quote for two /31s. I have an existing contract elsewhere with them, and they gave me 3x /29s gratis (for three different ASNs, sets of BGP sessions, ec.). Now they're charging for each IP.
I thought charging for BGP sessions was ridiculous, but now for individual IPs to use those BGP sessions...
----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/64BRVJOZ... _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/JS2RKN3Q...
NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/D3GWGJFM...