Re: Charging for IPs

On Sun, 6 Sept 2026 at 20:17, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:

Since the context here is “charging for a /31 for bgp”, I presumed we were talking point to point private peering.

Seems tautology to stress that ebgp with no options on ipv4 (31) or ipv6 (127) for next hop, has no options for next hop. But I guess repetition is the mother of learning In spirit of repetition, this IPv4 NLRI over IPv6 session makes no behavioural changes to class of next-hops allowable. -- ++ytti