6 Sep
2026
6 Sep
'26
5:17 p.m.
Since the context here is “charging for a /31 for bgp”, I presumed we were talking point to point private peering. Owen
On Sep 5, 2026, at 23:08, Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sept 2026 at 07:04, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
Of course that only applies to routes where the NLRI is the adjacent advertising router.
I don't think RFC makes any such restriction, just like IPv4 NH on IPv4 prefix, eBGP would allow it to be any on-link, and iBGP wouldn't care at all.
But you should be resetting next-hop in IXP already to the peer address, so that traffic isn't driven to other networks. -- ++ytti