We run FRR for RR’s with full tables in the default vrf and a L3VPN plus multiple additional L3VPN’s. 6PE, 6VPE both work. No complaints. [cid:ignored-in-diff-30BE7347-88C8-456D-95A2-E75A56BBF1DB] Evan S. Weiner Managing Member , Hosted Backbone, LLC d: (804) 549-4899<tel:(804)%20549-4899> | m: (804) 677-9544<tel:(804)%20677-9544> e: eweiner@hostedbackbone.net<mailto:eweiner@hostedbackbone.net> | w: <https://www.hostedbackbone.net/> www.hostedbackbone.net<https://www.hostedbackbone.net/> ________________________________ From: Tom Samplonius via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 2:22:14 AM To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Cc: Tom Samplonius <tom@samplonius.org> Subject: FRR for BGP route reflectors? Hi, Is Free Range Routing (FRR) a viable choice for a pure BGP route reflector for a regional ISP with ~ 35 routers? A mix of L3VPN-MPLS and BGP-EVPN services. Full transit, plus some peering. About 5 x L3VPN instances, and maybe 500 x EVPN-MPLS instances. I don’t see a lot of posts of people using FRR for RR. And not a lot of people reporting issues, so maybe it is just the perfect RR solution? Tom _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/STLGD7H4...