Works fine with NAT *with the caveat that there are a lot of workarounds and netcode issues* Without NAT it's a hell of a lot more reliable. There's a reason I ripped out all my NAT supporting code and don't support NAT scenarios outside of 1:1 NAT. -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2026 9:13 AM To: nanog@lists.nanog.org Cc: Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> Subject: Re: IPv4 flag day Am 21.06.26 um 11:21 schrieb Joe Hamelin via NANOG:
Businesses are slowly getting away from a phone on every desk due to company issued cell phones and remote workers. I'm not sure how that will play out with remote workers and VPN, which seem to be doing fine with RFC1918 space.
More and more use web-based services that use WebRTC. Works fine with NAT and SPI firewalls. Teams uses that. -- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/3UBD3FUV...