Allan, I agree with Andy: this isn’t a technical concern. Frankly I feel like your title was a bait, causing people like me working on real dns security to read your post , although I believe unintentionally. It isn’t a technical issue since nobody said all companies must use the com tld. If there’s sufficient demand surely someone will set up an alternative tld out of the US jurisdiction . So… problem solved? No need in new technology? And sorry if I’m grumpy today, it has been one of these days…. Amir -- Amir Herzberg Comcast professor of Security Innovations, Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut Homepage: https://sites.google.com/site/amirherzberg/home `Applied Introduction to Cryptography and Cybersecurity' textbook: https://www.worldscientific.com/pb-assets/wspc-site/catalogue-pdf/ComputerSc... <https://sites.google.com/site/amirherzberg/crypto-cyber-book> On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 9:37 AM Allan Liska via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
Considering that this is the second time in less than a week that a company has had their domain taken off line at the Registrar level ( https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/14/telegrams-shortlink-domain-is-back-online-...) I do think there is a legitmate technical concern here, though I'd argue it is far from new.
It is a scenario that most companies don't account for, but depending on the type of business you are in, it is a very real concern and you should have a response plan in place.
allan On Sunday, July 19th, 2026 at 9:08 AM, Andy Ringsmuth via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
Can we keep politics and personal opinions separate and independent of the technical aspects of the issue at hand (if there are any)? Per the NANOG list info page:
"Appropriate topics include: routing; broad-based engineering problems/issues/solutions; outages; performance measurement; evolving wide-area technologies; exchange points; traffic engineering; operational experience; ISP security; and trouble ticket systems."
Is there an actual legit technical issue here that needs discussion or solving?
---- Andy Ringsmuth andy@andyring.com
Love others, encourage others, help others.
On Jul 19, 2026, at 6:05 AM, Kevin Tillery via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
A Texas court has suspended the .com domain of a Dutch porn site which doesn't have any business presence in Texas, because it doesn't comply with Texas rules about porn (which are extremely onerous):
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxt...
Clearly the US is not fit to manage top-level domains (other than .us
of course) even though it ended up with them by historical accident. It worked for a while but now it's not working any more. Has anyone come up with any plan to solve this and make the DNS more neutral?
As a first step I'd think about experimenting with a DNS resolver that
would move all US TLDs to subdomains of .us. However that obviously would just break the current internet for whoever is using this resolver, at least due to widespread use of vhosts.
Kevin _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/55UTA3Q4...
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/EJC2UZCJ... _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/FARPULLL...