24 Jun
2014
24 Jun
'14
1:50 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Pieter Hulshoff <phulshof@aimvalley.nl> wrote:
features they should have. I'll then try to build a business case to get the product developed. MACsec is currently on the top of my own list, but I'll gladly pass other ideas to my colleagues.
what would be your key management strategy for the macsec version? given press / etc over the last 18 or so months it seems like folk with long-haul ether framing might be very interested in macsec for those links and NOT doing it by sticking some switch platform between the 2 routed endpoints. management of key material (and rolling and...) is probably interesting for them as well. -chris