Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
Suresh wrote:
The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately (and add professors of law to this already toxic mix)
Ahem. I resemble that remark. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
I hardly ever see you say something wrong about net neutrality or anything else :). No, other, far more usual suspects in mind here. On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell@isipp.com> wrote:
Suresh wrote:
The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately (and add professors of law to this already toxic mix)
Ahem. I resemble that remark.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
-- --srs (iPad)
participants (2)
-
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. -
Suresh Ramasubramanian