What about the cable providers that have chunks of 24/8?
62/8, 63/8 and 64/8 are being assigned now.
So you just relax the filters according to what's being assigned.
AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8.
Mark Milhollan writes...
AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8.
And how many routes has it been split up into? -- Phil Howard +-------------------------------------------------------------+ KA9WGN | House committee changes freedom bill to privacy invasion !! | phil at | more info: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,14180,00.html | milepost.com +-------------------------------------------------------------+
At 09:12 AM 10/9/97 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
Mark Milhollan writes...
AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8.
And how many routes has it been split up into?
According to nitrous, they are not announcing anything more specific than 12/8. -Steve
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Steve Meuse wrote:
At 09:12 AM 10/9/97 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
Mark Milhollan writes...
AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8.
And how many routes has it been split up into?
According to nitrous, they are not announcing anything more specific than 12/8.
There are about 80 networks out of the 12/8 netblock allocated and advertised. Most of these are /19's, some are larger and a few are smaller (a couple of /20's). As someone from AT&T said earlier in this thread "they are being allocated to customers as if it were a nonportable block and the only way you will see the more specific routes is if the customers multihome" (or something to that effect). I haven't seen any of these subnetworks of 12/8 advertised by anyone other than AT&T. bye, ken emery
AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8.
And how many routes has it been split up into?
According to nitrous, they are not announcing anything more specific than 12/8.
ken> There are about 80 networks out of the 12/8 netblock allocated ken> and advertised. Most of these are /19's, some are larger and ken> a few are smaller (a couple of /20's). [...] Those leaked more-specifics are only seen by customers, due to some old vendor policy constraints. We'll fix that pronto. ken> As someone from AT&T said earlier in this thread "they are being ken> allocated to customers as if it were a nonportable block and the ken> only way you will see the more specific routes is if the ken> customers multihome" (or something to that effect). I haven't ken> seen any of these subnetworks of 12/8 advertised by anyone other ken> than AT&T. One /24 from 12/8 is currently visible thru certain Internet vantage points: 12.10.231/255.255.255 GoodNet (5696) N=192.41.177.101 5696 7369 IGP Grid (6113) N=192.41.177.101 6113 5696 7369 IGP Jay B. -- Jay Borkenhagen jayb@att.com AT&T WorldNet Service PGP: 09 2F 9B 83 7E 6A DC 51 2D 4A 1C FD C9 45 98 44
On Thu, 09 Oct 1997 06:01:19 -0700, Mark Milhollan <mlm@ftel.net> said:
What about the cable providers that have chunks of 24/8?
62/8, 63/8 and 64/8 are being assigned now.
So you just relax the filters according to what's being assigned.
Mark> AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8. Yes, we are, but allocation to customers and assignment by registries are different things: AT&T has been assigned 12/8, and we're announcing 12/8. Customers are being allocated portions of this non-portable space, and you'll only see more-specifics when our customers multi-home. This is just like any other CIDR block used for customers. No one is currently assigned 62/8, for example, so no one should be announcing 62/8. Jay B. -- Jay Borkenhagen jayb@att.com AT&T WorldNet Service PGP: 09 2F 9B 83 7E 6A DC 51 2D 4A 1C FD C9 45 98 44
participants (5)
-
Jay Borkenhagen -
ken emery -
Mark Milhollan -
Phil Howard -
Steve Meuse