Re: 'Call Before You Dig' Article: [Was Re: Cogent norther california fiber cut -- details?]
The URL that should have been shown in the preceding message: "Call Before You Dig" by Glenn Fox http://www.pobonline.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/Article/0,9169,100727,00.htm... Sorry about that. Frank A. Coluccio DTI Consulting Inc. 212-857-8150 Office 347-526-6788 Mobile ------ On Sat May 14 14:31 , Frank Coluccio sent:
Pete, All,
This may be slightly OT, but I thought it would be of interest to many here, just the same:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx\?msgid=21324247
Comments concerning live outage reporting from Sean Donelan and others who've stayed on top of outage and D/R matters would be appreciated, either on list or off. TIA.
Frank A. Coluccio DTI Consulting Inc. 212-857-8150 Office 347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sat May 14 7:33 , Pete Templin sent:
John van Oppen wrote:
Anyone know anything about the Fiber cut that took Cogent's Seattle POP out of commission at about 6 PM (PST) today?
AboveNet reported a fiber cut at 1852PDT which they believe to be in the Sacramento area. Oddly enough, we saw a regular stream of ~5000 BGP update messages received every five minutes from 2230CDT to 0330CDT; I've asked if this was related to the fiber cut but haven't gotten a reply.
pt
This issue went national in March 2005 with the addition of a new N11 number for "One Call" notification. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257293A1.pdf The new abbreviated number will be 811 and it looks like carriers are required to implement by April 2007--since it's been in the Federal Register for about a month now. http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a050413c.html ../C Frank Coluccio wrote:
The URL that should have been shown in the preceding message:
"Call Before You Dig" by Glenn Fox
http://www.pobonline.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/Article/0,9169,100727,00.htm...
On Sat May 14 14:31 , Frank Coluccio sent:
Pete, All,
This may be slightly OT, but I thought it would be of interest to many here, just the same:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx\?msgid=21324247
Comments concerning live outage reporting from Sean Donelan and others who've stayed on top of outage and D/R matters would be appreciated, either on list or off. TIA.
Curtis Doty wrote:
This issue went national in March 2005 with the addition of a new N11 number for "One Call" notification. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257293A1.pdf
The new abbreviated number will be 811 and it looks like carriers are required to implement by April 2007--since it's been in the Federal Register for about a month now. http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a050413c.html
../C
But is it applicable to VOIP carriers? Roy Engehausen
Roy <garlic@garlic.com> writes:
This issue went national in March 2005 with the addition of a new N11 number for "One Call" notification. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257293A1.pdf
The new abbreviated number will be 811 and it looks like carriers are required to implement by April 2007--since it's been in the Federal Register for about a month now. http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a050413c.html
But is it applicable to VOIP carriers?
Call-Before-You-Dig is not applicable to users of dig(1). Not being facilities-based, I don't believe VoIP carriers will be required to be participating utilities in One Call. Seriously, though, I can't imagine why VoIP providers would resist being involved in three-digit "One Call" programs any more than they resist implementing 611 or 411 calling. Sending to the CBUD service that serves the billling address of the VoIP phone should be close enough for government work and the liability issues involving misdirected e911 access and the need for super accurate physical location information (both existing because human lives are acutely at risk) simply aren't there in this application. Stated another way, if it were acceptable to shuffle an e911 caller around to four different agencies before they found the right one, require them to give the address where they were physically located manually, and then it was OK to take up to 48 hours to arrive, nobody would be resisting implementing e911 either. :) ---Rob
Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
Roy <garlic@garlic.com> writes:
But is it applicable to VOIP carriers?
Call-Before-You-Dig is not applicable to users of dig(1). Not being facilities-based, I don't believe VoIP carriers will be required to be participating utilities in One Call.
Nahhh, just implement VoIP N11 services as anycast :-) Jeff
participants (5)
-
Curtis Doty
-
Frank Coluccio
-
Jeff Kell
-
Robert E.Seastrom
-
Roy