RE: You are right [was Re: Ungodly packet loss rates]
That would be a lot of fun. I always had nice laughs looking at measurement techniques so prevalent in the respective publications. --vadim From: Peter Ford <peterf@microsoft.com> Another pragmatic solution is to call the editors of comm week, network world, data communications and suggest that they might get a lot of mileage writing a story comparing and contrasting the performance of ISPs. They do this for routers, bridges, FR services so they can probably find a respectable consulting/measurement group to collect information. Some of this could be live empirical data and some of this could be survey. cheers, peter
At 9:28 PM -0400 10/22/96, Vadim Antonov wrote:
...I always had nice laughs looking at measurement techniques so prevalent in the respective publications.
--vadim
From: Peter Ford <peterf@microsoft.com>
Another pragmatic solution is to call the editors of comm week, network world, data communications and suggest that they might get a lot of mileage writing a story comparing and contrasting the performance of ISPs.
On Wed, 23 Oct 1996, Steve Goldstein wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree! __ Todd Graham Lewis Linux! Core Engineering Mindspring Enterprises tlewis@mindspring.com (800) 719 4664, x2804
At 8:13 AM -0400 10/23/96, Todd Graham Lewis wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 1996, Steve Goldstein wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree!
Given that you were rated #1, who'da thunk otherwise? (^_^) --SG
participants (3)
-
Steve Goldstein
-
Todd Graham Lewis
-
Vadim Antonov