Bogon list update for prefix for 5.1.0.0/19
Dear all, We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range. Thanks. -- Best regards, Evgeniy Aikashev network engineer PJSC DATAGROUP
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
Dear all, We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do you have a test IP address that can be pinged or traceroute to? ~Seth
On 28/05/12 22:19, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do you have a test IP address that can be pinged or traceroute to?
5.1.1.1 works for me (ping/traceroute), from AS35228. Regards,
On Tue, 29 May 2012 20:45:51 +0100, Paul Cupis said:
On 28/05/12 22:19, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do you have a test IP address that can be pinged or traceroute to?
5.1.1.1 works for me (ping/traceroute), from AS35228.
Given the allegations of squatting in 5/8, are you sure you got the *right* 5.1.1.1?
I did a tracert from my school's network on TWC: ~~~~~~~~~ Tracing route to 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua [5.1.1.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 5 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms esc033.escriptconnect.com [64.132.85.33] 6 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms chi2-pr1-xe-0-3-0-0.us.twtelecom.net[66.192.245 .166] 7 140 ms 139 ms 139 ms 64.211.193.22 8 140 ms 140 ms 140 ms 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua[5.1.1.1] Trace complete. ~~~~~~~~~ Hop 7 is owned by Level 3. Hope this helps. -Grant On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:53 PM, <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 20:45:51 +0100, Paul Cupis said:
On 28/05/12 22:19, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do you have a test IP address that can be pinged or traceroute to?
5.1.1.1 works for me (ping/traceroute), from AS35228.
Given the allegations of squatting in 5/8, are you sure you got the *right* 5.1.1.1?
No problems tracing from AS19945. Robex.com shows 5.1.0.0/19 belonging to AS21219 Ran traceroute, mtr, and windows pathping. No problems with any of them. # traceroute -A 5.1.1.1 traceroute to 5.1.1.1 (5.1.1.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1st 3 hops snipped 4 cr83.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.139.50) [AS7018] 8.743 ms 8.755 ms 8.748 ms 5 cr1.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.18.110) [AS7018] 8.792 ms 8.800 ms 8.784 ms 6 gar25.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.85.233) [AS7018] 5.941 ms 192.205.32.178 (192.205.32.178) [*] 5.524 ms 5.377 ms 7 64.211.193.22 (64.211.193.22) [AS3549] 161.212 ms 162.769 ms 196.734 ms 8 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua (5.1.1.1) [AS21219] 162.187 ms 160.830 ms 161.757 ms My traceroute [v0.75] TEC-MAILSCAN-DMZ.granbury.k12.tx.us (0.0.0.0) Tue May 29 16:30:56 2012 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1st 2 hops snipped 3. cr83.dlstx.ip.att.net 0.0% 200 6.0 6.4 5.2 40.6 2.5 4. cr1.dlstx.ip.att.net 0.0% 200 9.1 8.6 5.4 50.8 4.2 5. gar25.dlstx.ip.att.net 0.0% 200 5.0 5.3 4.7 15.9 0.9 6. 192.205.32.178 0.0% 186 5.1 18.3 5.0 195.7 35.7 7. 64.211.193.22 0.0% 186 184.4 170.3 159.4 254.3 14.3 8. 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua 0.0% 186 187.5 167.1 159.5 189.2 7.1 C:\Windows\System32>pathping 5.1.1.1 Tracing route to 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua [5.1.1.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1st 3 hops removed..... 4 cr84.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.138.54] 5 cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.18.250] 6 gar27.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.77] 7 192.205.34.82 8 64.211.193.22 9 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua [5.1.1.1] Computing statistics for 225 seconds... Source to Here This Node/Link Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address 1st 3 hops removed......... 4 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% cr84.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.138.54] 0/ 100 = 0% | 5 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.18.250] 0/ 100 = 0% | 6 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% gar27.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.77] 0/ 100 = 0% | 7 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 192.205.34.82 0/ 100 = 0% | 8 191ms 2/ 100 = 2% 2/ 100 = 2% 64.211.193.22 0/ 100 = 0% | 9 191ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua [5.1.1.1] Curtis -----Original Message----- From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey123@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 4:02 PM To: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Paul Cupis; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Bogon list update for prefix for 5.1.0.0/19 I did a tracert from my school's network on TWC: ~~~~~~~~~ Tracing route to 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua [5.1.1.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 5 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms esc033.escriptconnect.com [64.132.85.33] 6 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms chi2-pr1-xe-0-3-0-0.us.twtelecom.net[66.192.245 .166] 7 140 ms 139 ms 139 ms 64.211.193.22 8 140 ms 140 ms 140 ms 5-1-1-1-dynamic.retail.datagroup.ua[5.1.1.1] Trace complete. ~~~~~~~~~ Hop 7 is owned by Level 3. Hope this helps. -Grant On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:53 PM, <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 20:45:51 +0100, Paul Cupis said:
On 28/05/12 22:19, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do you have a test IP address that can be pinged or traceroute to?
5.1.1.1 works for me (ping/traceroute), from AS35228.
Given the allegations of squatting in 5/8, are you sure you got the *right* 5.1.1.1?
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:31:34PM +0300, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
You're probably going to go and have a stern word with the Hamachi people, too -- they've been squatting on that space for a while now. - Matt
On May 28, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:31:34PM +0300, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs. Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
You're probably going to go and have a stern word with the Hamachi people, too -- they've been squatting on that space for a while now.
Are they still doing that? Back when I was at IANA, I mentioned that their usage of 5/8 was a really bad idea that was going to bite them. IIRC they indicated they were going to migrate to a different approach... Regards, -drc
participants (8)
-
David Conrad -
Evgeniy Aikashev -
Grant Ridder -
Matthew Palmer -
Paul Cupis -
Seth Mattinen -
STARNES, CURTIS -
valdis.kletnieks＠vt.edu