Fwd: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com> Date: Feb 12, 2007 4:13 PM Subject: Re: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11 To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> Paul, that's very interesting. A query: "AMT Site: A multicast-enabled network not connected to the multicast backbone served by an AMT Gateway. It could also be a stand-alone AMT Gateway." Should that read: a multicast-enabled network, not connected to the multicast backbone, served by an AMT Gateway? It looks like it from the meat of the RFC. On 12 Feb 2007 06:14:00 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-00 is what i expect. note: i've drunk that koolaid & am helping on the distribution side. -- Paul Vixie
Hello; On Feb 12, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com> Date: Feb 12, 2007 4:13 PM Subject: Re: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11 To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Paul, that's very interesting. A query:
"AMT Site : A multicast-enabled network not connected to the multicast backbone served by an AMT Gateway. It could also be a stand-alone AMT Gateway."
Should that read: a multicast-enabled network, not connected to the multicast backbone, served by an AMT Gateway? It looks like it from the meat of the RFC.
If you point is that the commas are needed, I think that you are correct. I will forward this to the list. There is a low volume AMT specific list for deployers that I host; you can read about it and join at http://www.multicasttech.com/AMT/ Regards Marshall
On 12 Feb 2007 06:14:00 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> wrote: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-00 is what i expect. note: i've drunk that koolaid & am helping on the distribution side. -- Paul Vixie
participants (2)
-
Alexander Harrowell -
Marshall Eubanks