At the risk of suggesting that Bellcore solved the problem, aren't there some prevailing standards here? Andrew Bender tns-inc.com
From: DeepBlue
This is a little off of the normal lines of the list. But I am at a loss as to what naming convention I should use with my new set of servers.
At the risk of suggesting that Bellcore solved the problem, aren't there some prevailing standards here?
Domain servers in listed order: DNS.BELLCORE.COM 128.96.41.3 NS.BELLCORE.COM 128.96.41.1 NS.USWEST.COM 130.13.16.6 Apparently not. -and- their nameservers are in the same netblock. --msa
because of a firewall at Bellcore, I can't tell if this is the case. However, it should be noted that just because two nameservers share a /24, doesn't mean they are located at the same facility: traceroute to ns1.nac.net (207.99.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 f0-0-1.colo1.oct.nac.net (209.123.109.1) 0.778 ms 0.764 ms 0.705 ms 2 ns1 (207.99.0.1) 0.511 ms 0.507 ms 0.436 ms traceroute to ns2.nac.net (207.99.0.2), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 f0-0-1.colo1.oct.nac.net (209.123.109.1) 0.709 ms 0.969 ms 0.701 ms 2 f4-1-0-1.core2.oct.nac.net (209.123.168.225) 0.948 ms 0.708 ms 0.721 ms 3 s5-1.core1.nyc.nac.net (209.123.11.222) 7.275 ms 6.214 ms 2.900 ms 4 ns2 (207.99.0.2) 5.116 ms 10.012 ms 4.200 ms On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Majdi Abbas wrote:
At the risk of suggesting that Bellcore solved the problem, aren't there some prevailing standards here?
Domain servers in listed order:
DNS.BELLCORE.COM 128.96.41.3 NS.BELLCORE.COM 128.96.41.1 NS.USWEST.COM 130.13.16.6
Apparently not.
-and- their nameservers are in the same netblock.
--msa
participants (4)
-
Alex Rubenstein -
Andrew Bender -
Majdi Abbas -
Richard Irving