Hello Pedram, Until everyone fully understands the truth in ENGLISH, this topic will continue. This is what they demand. As long as there are questions which relate to us, I will continue to respond. When it's set in stone, and the false claims and false statements are corrected, this topic will cease. I hope soon, people will realise and accept the truth that we are a LEGITIMATE Company that DOES Operate in the USA. We are NOT directly or in-directly related to any Russian's. We do NOT support, write, directly distribute, or knowingly allow the distribution of malware or other abusive activities to originate from our network. While the previous statements are questionable in the public's eye, I hope some time, you will understand it IS the truth. Prove me wrong, PLEASE. If you know of any further malware or further abusive activities, such as the claimed C&C Botnets, please PLEASE don't hesitate to tell me. abuse.intercage and russ..intercage and emil.intercage are live and operational. We are currently investigating the rest of our clientel and any site's or communities you can recommend to follow, we will follow.  While it is clear that this will not be accepted by the community any time soon, it will eventually be accepted. That is what I am waiting for, however long it takes. I can't stress this enough. We DO need your help to locate and eliminate abusive activities from our network. I know you have information, and I need you to atleast reclaim the faith that we WILL be very active against abuse originating from our network, and we WILL be proactive to locate and eliminate abusive activities on our network. Thank you very much for all your time and future assistance. Have a great day. --- Russell Mitchell InterCage, Inc. ----- Original Message ---- From: Pedram M <pmessri@gmail.com> To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:38:54 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Wow, this topic has really gotten old. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Russell Mitchell <russm2k8@yahoo.com> wrote:

...

Sorry I didn't make this clear enough in the previous responses.

The prefixes that are registered to Inhoster belong to Esthost. I'm not sure how or why you think those prefixes belong to us.

These prefixes belong DIRECTLY to us: - 69.50.160.0/19              Withdrawn - 216.255.176.0/20            Withdrawn

These prefixes belong DIRECTLY to nLayer, and were LEASED to us: - 69.22.162.0/23              Withdrawn - 69.22.168.0/21              Withdrawn - 69.22.184.0/22              Withdrawn - 69.31.64.0/20              Withdrawn

The prefixes LEASED to us BY nLayer are being reclaimed at the end of this month 09/30/08, as the lease contract is set to cease at that time.

Hopefully, that is clear enough for you.

Thank you for your time. Have a great day. --- Russell Mitchell

InterCage, Inc.

Clear as mud, thanks.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFI2d6uq1pz9mNUZTMRAmkcAJ4toRsggJ325VfjkqK8QJKWQG4UegCg84x+ KwcuyxtFp7/x3/vScFTkP3I= =/vFy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson   Engineering Architecture for the Internet   fergdawgster(at)gmail.com   ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/