Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd)
28 Oct
2003
28 Oct
'03
1:53 p.m.
Yes, because IPv6 is merely and incremental improvement, not a grand elegant solution to world hunger like ATM. Look at how we managed the incremental step of adding MPLS to our IPv4 networks. It was fairly painless because it uses the same boxes, the same people and the same management systems. And over time, the pain of doing MPLS is reduced because the bugs get worked out.
Yes, but did MPLS require different ASICs?
In some cases, yes. Cisco Catalyst 6500 with Sup2/MSFC2/PFC2 cannot do MPLS by itself, while 6500 with Sup720 can. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
7727
Age (days ago)
7727
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
sthaugļ¼ nethelp.no