Many web sites which are mulihome/mult co-located seem to act differnetly depend on which DNS severs that we use. Questions: 1. Does anyone have lists of DNS servers by region to may optimize the path?-- of course it may depend on the network topology ...Assume that If ISP is fully messed with others.. ie Teir I provider for exmaple. 2. what is the typical of method they(web hosts) used to decide which one to give? Tatsuya --------------------------------------------------- Tatsuya Kawasaki - Engineer III - CSC tatsuya.kawasaki@allegiancetelecom.com - 240-616-2417 800-581-8711 (24 Hour Support) - 240-616-2414 (fax) Allegiance Internet
Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
Many web sites which are mulihome/mult co-located seem to act differnetly depend on which DNS severs that we use.
Questions: 1. Does anyone have lists of DNS servers by region to may optimize the path?-- of course it may depend on the network topology ...Assume that If ISP is fully messed with others.. ie Teir I provider for exmaple.
2. what is the typical of method they(web hosts) used to decide which one to give?
Many DNS "load balancing" solutions will return the address of the web server closest to the _query source_. This means these systems work best when your recursive DNS servers are topologically closest to your users. S
Stephen, thnx .. I think query source refer to DNS server right? not necessary actally host that requesting qurey? Suppose if a ISP does not have fully messed DNS server then result may not be optimum? --------------------------------------------------- Tatsuya Kawasaki - Engineer III - CSC tatsuya.kawasaki@allegiancetelecom.com - 240-616-2417 800-581-8711 (24 Hour Support) - 240-616-2414 (fax) Allegiance Internet On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:21:45 -0600 From: Stephen Sprunk <ssprunk@cisco.com> To: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com>, nanog ml <nanog@merit.edu> Subject: Re: lists of DNS servers by region.
Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
Many web sites which are mulihome/mult co-located seem to act differnetly depend on which DNS severs that we use.
Questions: 1. Does anyone have lists of DNS servers by region to may optimize the path?-- of course it may depend on the network topology ...Assume that If ISP is fully messed with others.. ie Teir I provider for exmaple.
2. what is the typical of method they(web hosts) used to decide which one to give?
Many DNS "load balancing" solutions will return the address of the web server closest to the _query source_. This means these systems work best when your recursive DNS servers are topologically closest to your users.
S
Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com> writes:
Stephen, thnx .. I think query source refer to DNS server right? not necessary actally host that requesting qurey?
Correct.
Suppose if a ISP does not have fully messed DNS server then result may not be optimum?
Also correct. A problem with certain national ISPs that have a very small number of nameservers to serve dialup customers nationwide. ---Rob
have a look at http://www.nrg4u.com at the bottom of the page BGPDNS. P.
Many DNS "load balancing" solutions will return the address of the web server closest to the _query source_. This means these systems work best when your recursive DNS servers are topologically closest to your users.
Correct me if I am wrong.. But.. I don't think multiple 'A' record load balancing will return the IP address of the web server that is closest to the _query_source_. If this is true, then Akamai has reinvented the wheel with their near-by DNS setup on *.g.akamai.net entries. The NS entry 'name server' record that is closest to the _query_source_ may answer the DNS query.. I.e... such as f.root-servers.net serving many pacific traffic as well as western US in majority. -hc
S
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:42:08 EST, Haesu said:
Many DNS "load balancing" solutions will return the address of the web server closest to the _query source_. This means these systems work best when your recursive DNS servers are topologically closest to your users.
Correct me if I am wrong.. But..
I don't think multiple 'A' record load balancing will return the IP address of the web server that is closest to the _query_source_. If this is true, then Akamai has reinvented the wheel with their near-by DNS setup on *.g.akamai.net entries.
Akamai doesn't use the usual round-robin. They do OTHER magic. Some solutions use a special magic DNS backend that will launch a PING or other RTT detector from the multiple service locations, and then return the location with the lowest RTT. Of course, this means you're measuring the RTT from the servers to the user's DNS server - if they're using a DNS server that's a long way away network-wise, this can produce odd results. The problem is that the backend doesn't know the source of the original query, they only know the IP address of the DNS server that's doing the recursion. -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Akamai doesn't use the usual round-robin. They do OTHER magic.
The OTHER magic Akamai uses can be replicated by using BIND 9's view functions on specific IP blocks for query sources. The problem is, you need to write a backend program that figures out the closest layer3 hops or AS hops and even combine it with latency if necessary, in which it will then update your named.conf's view function section. (Unless you have named.conf split over using include directives for 'views') For your secondary nearby DNS servers running BIND9, you should not slave the zones under view functions b/c view will only return the zone file that your secondary DNS server's IP matches for the query source. You'd need to use rsync or cvsup, then do a reload/restart on named.. Schedule it using crond or whatever.. What I have been told is that Akamai's nearby DNS' selection algorithm is partially based on number of AS hops from BGP path table. These are simply my thoughts+solutions that will give you the simple way to setup nearby DNS tricks/MAGICS, using sorted open source stuff that's all around the 'net.
The problem is that the backend doesn't know the source of the original query, they only know the IP address of the DNS server that's doing the recursion.
My thoughts here again, do not solve this problem. This is beyond the technical limit of the way DNS infrastructure works on internet.. :-( Perhaps someone could setup like a distributed load balancer that can tunnel the traffic from one place to the other, depending on source of the actual tcp/80 traffic to the web server... But then the SYN packet still has to go thru the load balancer and travel over the tunnel, not being so effective in terms of content delivery. -hc
-- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
ultradns had a solution that claimed to be intelligent about this problem. Bri On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
Many web sites which are mulihome/mult co-located seem to act differnetly depend on which DNS severs that we use.
Questions: 1. Does anyone have lists of DNS servers by region to may optimize the path?-- of course it may depend on the network topology ...Assume that If ISP is fully messed with others.. ie Teir I provider for exmaple.
2. what is the typical of method they(web hosts) used to decide which one to give?
Tatsuya
--------------------------------------------------- Tatsuya Kawasaki - Engineer III - CSC tatsuya.kawasaki@allegiancetelecom.com - 240-616-2417 800-581-8711 (24 Hour Support) - 240-616-2414 (fax) Allegiance Internet
participants (7)
-
Brian
-
Haesu
-
Pascal Gloor
-
rs@seastrom.com
-
Stephen Sprunk
-
Tatsuya Kawasaki
-
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu