[Administrivia]: Please end this Thread: RE: "Cisco gate" and "Me et the Fed" at Defcon....
Good Morning, Perhaps Susan was not clear enough yesterday. The mailing list administrative committee would request that you allow this thread to stop. It has certainly outlived its operational usefulness. I am now reiterating that request. Regards, Chris Malayter NANOG Mailing List Administration Team
-----Original Message----- From: Geo. [mailto:geoincidents@nls.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:10 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....
ok so your issue is totally irrelvant to the recent "ciscogate" paranoia?
That would depend on what other exploits cisco has slipstream patched wouldn't it? (honest question as I don't know but it would be nice if cisco would clarify the situation)
Geo.
George Roettger Netlink Services
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:28:58 CDT, "Malayter, Christopher" said:
Perhaps Susan was not clear enough yesterday. The mailing list administrative committee would request that you allow this thread to stop. It has certainly outlived its operational usefulness. I am now reiterating that request.
Unfortunately, there's enough places where this touches on operational issues (such as getting enough information about a new release of router software so you can make informed decisions affecting your customers). And obviously, a number of people think this is an important subject. I suspect that adding a "This would be more on-topic/relevant on the XYZ list" would help kill it here... Any suggestions where it would be more relevant?
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
I suspect that adding a "This would be more on-topic/relevant on the XYZ list" would help kill it here...
Any suggestions where it would be more relevant?
how about cisco-nsp? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
I suspect the problem is not the operation aspects of the discussion, but rather the nasty and sometimes personal invectives flying around. They were particularly prevalent in the "Cisco gate" thread, and generally absent in the other threads. Just my 2 cents. YMMV - Dan On 8/2/05 11:28 AM, "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:28:58 CDT, "Malayter, Christopher" said:
Perhaps Susan was not clear enough yesterday. The mailing list administrative committee would request that you allow this thread to stop. It has certainly outlived its operational usefulness. I am now reiterating that request.
Unfortunately, there's enough places where this touches on operational issues (such as getting enough information about a new release of router software so you can make informed decisions affecting your customers). And obviously, a number of people think this is an important subject.
I suspect that adding a "This would be more on-topic/relevant on the XYZ list" would help kill it here...
Any suggestions where it would be more relevant?
participants (4)
-
Daniel Golding -
Jon Lewis -
Malayter, Christopher -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu