Re: Sprint peering policy
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 21:07:06 -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > It's all so much posturing, just like the people who claim they need OC768 > now or any time in the near future, or the people who sell 1Mbps customers > on the fact that their OC192 links are important. > If there is more than ~150Gbps of traffic total (counting the traffic only > once through the system) going through the US backbones I'd be very > surprised. Several estimates floating around (*) suggest between 60 and 100 PB (petabytes) per month of US backbone traffic, which works out to 180 and 300 Gb/s average traffic. Andrew Odlyzko (*) See my papers at <http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/networks.html>, or a recent (and about to be updated) report from RHK.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:03:45PM -0500, Andrew Odlyzko wrote:
Several estimates floating around (*) suggest between 60 and 100 PB (petabytes) per month of US backbone traffic, which works out to 180 and 300 Gb/s average traffic.
Oh I should also point out that I was guessing as to traffic exchanged between networks through peering not total transit traffic to "the internet", so 701 cust to 701 cust doesn't count. Incase anyone was confused about that. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
participants (2)
-
Andrew Odlyzko
-
Richard A Steenbergen