Sorry for this message; it seems that merit.edu had problems with your message (and some with one from Sean) at the time in question. This appears to have been fixed for several days, now. Steve R. ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: list-admin@merit.edu Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by home.merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id TAA16742; Mon, 22 May 1995 19:02:39 -0400 Received: from home.merit.edu (home.merit.edu [198.108.60.42]) by merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id SAA00380 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Mon, 22 May 1995 18:32:54 -0400 Received: (from sjr@localhost) by home.merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) id SAA15604; Mon, 22 May 1995 18:32:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 18:32:51 -0400 From: "Steven J. Richardson" <sjr@merit.edu> Message-Id: <199505222232.SAA15604@home.merit.edu> To: briank@kimbro.com, nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Delegation Status: O Brian: Please cease this. thanks, Steve Richardson/Merit ==

From list-admin@merit.edu Fri May 19 03:27:59 1995 Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by home.merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id DAA19726; Fri, 19 May 1995 03:26:36 -0400 Received: from kimbro.kimbro.com (root@[199.33.239.1]) by merit.edu (8.6.10/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id PAA06014 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Wed, 17 May 1995 15:22:36 -0400 Received: from kimbro.kimbro.com (briank@localhost.kimbro.com [127.0.0.1]) by kimbro.kimbro.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA07439 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Wed, 17 May 1995 12:21:54 -0700 Message-Id: <199505171921.MAA07439@kimbro.kimbro.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94 To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Delegation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 12:21:52 -0700 From: "D. Brian Kimmel" <briank@Kimbro.Com> Status: R

Is there a document or reference available that spells out the proper way to delegate in-addr authority? Thanks Brian D. Brian Kimmel Kimbro, Inc. Voice 937-8381 ------- End of Forwarded Message