Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign
Jerry,
One question - if I previously typed in an URL that was incorrect and would get the usual response from my OWN system, there would be not a real lot of data sent/received to pay for that mistake. Now that Verisign is doing their current thing, there is a lot more data being paid by ISPs across the world
An interesting thought... Jerry that shouldnt HAVE to be paid for.
So is anyone thinking of banding together the ISPs in on this formal
complaint citing loss of income >from this? The bigger the ISP - eg AOL - the bigger the new cost for Verisign advertising, paid at the >ISP's expense because of all this. A group of ISPs all complaining should get some action you would >think.
I am posting this to you as if you can use it, feel free to post it to
Nanog where I have no posting rights.
Regards, Greg.
.
Somebody pointed out, on another list, that Verisign's move is essentially a "man in the middle" attack. Which leads to the question: are they in violation of any Federal laws - such as, say, the Patriot Act?
participants (2)
-
Jerry Eyers
-
Miles Fidelman